你能举一个具体的例子,什么时候最好使用私有继承而不是组合?就个人而言,我将使用组合而不是私有继承,但在某些情况下,使用私有继承可能是特定问题的最佳解决方案.阅读 C++ faq,为您提供了一个使用示例私有继承,但我似乎更容易使用组合+策略模式,甚至比私有继承更容易使用公共继承.
Can you give me a concrete example when is preferable to use private inheritance over composition? Personally, I will use composition over private inheritance, but there might be the case that using private inheritance is the best solution for a particular problem. Reading the C++ faq, gives you an example on using private inheritance, but I seems easier to use composition + strategy pattern or even public inheritance than private inheritance.
private 继承通常用于表示implemented-in-terms-of".我看到的主要用途是使用私有多重继承的 mixin 来构建具有来自各种 mixin 父项的适当功能的子对象.这也可以通过组合来完成(我稍微喜欢),但是继承方法确实允许您使用 using 公开公开一些父方法,并且在使用 mixin 方法时允许使用更方便的符号.
private inheritance is typically used to represent "implemented-in-terms-of". The main use I have seen is for mixins using private multiple inheritance to build up a child object with the proper functionality from the various mixin parents. This can also be done with composition (which I slightly prefer) but the inheritance method DOES allow you to use using to expose some parent methods publicly, and allows for a slightly more convenient notation when using the mixin methods.
这篇关于何时使用 C++ 私有继承而不是组合?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速In what ways do C++ exceptions slow down code when there are no exceptions thown?(当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速度?)
为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?Why catch an exception as reference-to-const?(为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?)
我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?When and how should I use exception handling?(我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?)
C++中异常对象的范围Scope of exception object in C++(C++中异常对象的范围)
从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常Catching exceptions from a constructor#39;s initializer list(从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常)
C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别Difference between C++03 throw() specifier C++11 noexcept(C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别)