我有一段时间没有使用 C++,无法弄清楚为什么以下不起作用:
I haven't done C++ in a while and can't figure out why following doesn't work:
class A {
protected:
int num;
};
class B : public A {
};
main () {
B * bclass = new B ();
bclass->num = 1;
}
编译产生:
错误 C2248:A::num":无法访问类A"中声明的受保护成员
error C2248: 'A::num' : cannot access protected member declared in class 'A'
派生类不应该访问受保护的成员吗?
Shouldn't protected members be accessible by derived classes?
我错过了什么?
是的,派生类可以访问受保护的成员,但是您正在 main() 函数中访问它,该函数在层次结构之外.如果你在 B 类中声明一个方法并访问 num 就可以了.
yes protected members are accessible by derived classes but you are accessing it in the main() function, which is outside the hierarchy. If you declare a method in the class B and access num it will be fine.
这篇关于为什么我不能从派生类的实例访问受保护的成员?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速In what ways do C++ exceptions slow down code when there are no exceptions thown?(当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速度?)
为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?Why catch an exception as reference-to-const?(为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?)
我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?When and how should I use exception handling?(我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?)
C++中异常对象的范围Scope of exception object in C++(C++中异常对象的范围)
从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常Catching exceptions from a constructor#39;s initializer list(从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常)
C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别Difference between C++03 throw() specifier C++11 noexcept(C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别)