以下代码无法编译:
class A {
public:
A(int) {}
};
class B: virtual public A {
public:
B(): A(0) {}
};
// most derived class
class C: public B {
public:
C() {} // wrong!!!
};
如果我在C的构造函数初始化列表中调用A的构造函数,即:
If I call A's constructor in C's constructor initialization list, that is:
// most derived class
class C: public B {
public:
C(): A(0) {} // OK!!!
};
确实有效.
显然,这是因为虚拟基类必须始终由大多数派生类构建.
Apparently, the reason is because virtual base classes must always be constructed by the most derived classes.
我不明白这个限制背后的原因.
I don't understand the reason behind this limitation.
因为它避免了这个:
class A {
public:
A(int) {}
};
class B0: virtual public A {
public:
B0(): A(0) {}
};
class B1: virtual public A {
public:
B1(): A(1) {}
};
class C: public B0, public B1 {
public:
C() {} // How is A constructed? A(0) from B0 or A(1) from B1?
};
这篇关于为什么虚拟基类必须由最派生的类构造?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速In what ways do C++ exceptions slow down code when there are no exceptions thown?(当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速度?)
为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?Why catch an exception as reference-to-const?(为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?)
我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?When and how should I use exception handling?(我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?)
C++中异常对象的范围Scope of exception object in C++(C++中异常对象的范围)
从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常Catching exceptions from a constructor#39;s initializer list(从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常)
C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别Difference between C++03 throw() specifier C++11 noexcept(C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别)