将指针转换为 int 然后再转换回指针是否安全?
Is it safe to cast pointer to int and later back to pointer again?
如果我们知道指针是 32 位长,int 是 32 位长呢?
How about if we know if the pointer is 32 bit long and int is 32 bit long?
long* juggle(long* p) {
static_assert(sizeof(long*) == sizeof(int));
int v = reinterpret_cast<int>(p); // or if sizeof(*)==8 choose long here
do_some_math(v); // prevent compiler from optimizing
return reinterpret_cast<long*>(v);
}
int main() {
long* stuff = new long(42);
long* ffuts = juggle(stuff);
std::cout << "Is this always 42? " << *ffuts << std::endl;
}
这是否包含在标准中?
没有
例如,在 x86-64 上,一个指针是 64 位长,但 int 只有 32 位长.将指针转换为 int 并再次返回会使指针值的高 32 位丢失.
For instance, on x86-64, a pointer is 64-bit long, but int is only 32-bit long. Casting a pointer to int and back again makes the upper 32-bit of the pointer value lost.
如果你想要一个保证与指针一样长的整数类型,你可以在 中使用 intptr_t 类型.您可以安全地从指向 intptr_t 的指针重新解释转换并返回.
You may use the intptr_t type in <cstdint> if you want an integer type which is guaranteed to be as long as the pointer. You could safely reinterpret_cast from a pointer to an intptr_t and back.
这篇关于C++:将指针转换为 int 然后再转换回指针是否安全?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
std::reference_wrapper 和简单指针的区别?Difference between std::reference_wrapper and simple pointer?(std::reference_wrapper 和简单指针的区别?)
常量之间的区别.指针和引用?Difference between const. pointer and reference?(常量之间的区别.指针和引用?)
c++ - 如何从指向向量的指针访问向量的内容?How to access the contents of a vector from a pointer to the vector in C++?(c++ - 如何从指向向量的指针访问向量的内容?)
*& 的含义和**&在 C++ 中Meaning of *amp; and **amp; in C++(*amp; 的含义和**amp;在 C++ 中)
为什么我不能对普通变量进行多态?Why can#39;t I do polymorphism with normal variables?(为什么我不能对普通变量进行多态?)
取消引用已删除的指针总是会导致访问冲突?Dereferencing deleted pointers always result in an Access Violation?(取消引用已删除的指针总是会导致访问冲突?)