int* myPointer = new int[100];
// ...
int firstValue = *(myPointer + 0);
int secondValue = myPointer[1];
*(myPointer + index) 和 myPointer[index] 之间有什么功能上的区别吗?哪个被认为是更好的做法?
Is there any functional difference between *(myPointer + index) and myPointer[index]? Which is considered better practice?
在功能上,它们是相同的.
Functionally, they are identical.
从语义上讲,指针取消引用表示这是一件事,但我真的很关心 X 空格",而数组访问说这是一堆事情,我关心 Xcode>Xth 一个."
Semantically, the pointer dereference says "Here's a thing, but I really care about the thing X spaces over", while the array access says "Here's a bunch of things, I care about the Xth one."
在大多数情况下,我更喜欢数组形式.
In most cases, I would prefer the array form.
这篇关于*(Pointer + Index) 和 Pointer[] 的区别的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
std::reference_wrapper 和简单指针的区别?Difference between std::reference_wrapper and simple pointer?(std::reference_wrapper 和简单指针的区别?)
常量之间的区别.指针和引用?Difference between const. pointer and reference?(常量之间的区别.指针和引用?)
c++ - 如何从指向向量的指针访问向量的内容?How to access the contents of a vector from a pointer to the vector in C++?(c++ - 如何从指向向量的指针访问向量的内容?)
*& 的含义和**&在 C++ 中Meaning of *amp; and **amp; in C++(*amp; 的含义和**amp;在 C++ 中)
为什么我不能对普通变量进行多态?Why can#39;t I do polymorphism with normal variables?(为什么我不能对普通变量进行多态?)
取消引用已删除的指针总是会导致访问冲突?Dereferencing deleted pointers always result in an Access Violation?(取消引用已删除的指针总是会导致访问冲突?)