我有一些代码的工作原理类似于 TransactionScope 的建议使用,但具有环境连接而不是环境事务.
I have some code that works like the advised use of TransactionScope, but has an ambient connection instead of an ambient transaction.
有没有办法将 TransactionScope 对象与现有连接一起使用,或者 .Net 框架中是否有替代方案?
Is there a way to use a TransactionScope object with an existing connection, or is there an alternative in the .Net framework for this purpose?
其实只有一种方法.
connection.EnlistTransaction(Transaction.Current)
它有效,如果没有必要,它不会将交易提升为分布式(与文档所说相反)
It works and it doesnt promote transaction to distributed if not necessary (contrary to what documentation says)
HTH
这篇关于有没有办法将 TransactionScope 与现有连接一起使用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
LINQ to SQL 和并发问题LINQ to SQL and Concurrency Issues(LINQ to SQL 和并发问题)
try/catch 块的收益回报Yield return from a try/catch block(try/catch 块的收益回报)
重用带有事务的 SqlCommand 时,我应该调用 ParameShould I call Parameters.Clear when reusing a SqlCommand with a transation?(重用带有事务的 SqlCommand 时,我应该调用 Parameters.Clear 吗
SqlTransaction 是否需要调用 Dispose?Does SqlTransaction need to have Dispose called?(SqlTransaction 是否需要调用 Dispose?)
System.Transactions.TransactionInDoubtException 的原因Reason for System.Transactions.TransactionInDoubtException(System.Transactions.TransactionInDoubtException 的原因)
如何将 TransactionScope 与 MySql 和实体框架一起使用How do I use TransactionScope with MySql and Entity Framework? (getting Multiple simultaneous connections...are not currently supported error)(如何将