我知道拥有钻石继承被认为是不好的做法.但是,我有两个案例,我觉得钻石继承非常适合.我想问一下,在这些情况下你会推荐我使用菱形继承,还是有其他更好的设计.
I know that having diamond inheritance is considered bad practice. However, I have 2 cases in which I feel that diamond inheritance could fit very nicely. I want to ask, would you recommend me to use diamond inheritance in these cases, or is there another design that could be better.
案例 1: 我想在我的系统中创建代表不同类型操作"的类.动作由几个参数分类:
Case 1: I want to create classes that represent different kinds of "Actions" in my system. The actions are classified by several parameters:
我打算有以下设计:
// abstract classes
class Action
{
// methods relevant for all actions
};
class ActionRead : public virtual Action
{
// methods related to reading
};
class ActionWrite : public virtual Action
{
// methods related to writing
};
class ActionWithDelay : public virtual Action
{
// methods related to delay definition and handling
};
class ActionNoDelay : public virtual Action {/*...*
编译器如何处理编译时分支?What do compilers do with compile-time branching?(编译器如何处理编译时分支?)
我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗Can I use if (pointer) instead of if (pointer != NULL)?(我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗?)
在 C/C++ 中检查空指针Checking for NULL pointer in C/C++(在 C/C++ 中检查空指针)
比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1))&quMath-like chaining of the comparison operator - as in, quot;if ( (5lt;jlt;=1) )quot;(比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1)))
“if constexpr()"之间的区别与“if()"Difference between quot;if constexpr()quot; Vs quot;if()quot;(“if constexpr()之间的区别与“if())
C++,'if' 表达式中的变量声明C++, variable declaration in #39;if#39; expression(C++,if 表达式中的变量声明)