关于以下 C++ 程序:
Regarding the following C++ program:
class Base { };
class Child : public Base { };
int main()
{
// Normal: using child as base is allowed
Child *c = new Child();
Base *b = c;
// Double pointers: apparently can't use Child** as Base**
Child **cc = &c;
Base **bb = cc;
return 0;
}
GCC 在最后的赋值语句上产生以下错误:
GCC produces the following error on the last assignment statement:
error: invalid conversion from ‘Child**’ to ‘Base**’
我的问题分为两部分:
reinterpret_cast 使这个示例工作.使用这些强制转换意味着抛弃所有类型安全.有什么我可以添加到类定义中以使这些指针隐式转换的,或者至少以一种允许我使用 static_cast 的方式来表达转换?reinterpret_cast. Using these casts means throwing away all type safety. Is there anything I can add to the class definitions to make these pointers cast implicitly, or at least phrase the conversion in a way that allows me to use static_cast instead? 如果允许,你可以这样写:
If this was allowed, you could write this:
*bb = new Base;
而且c 最终会指向Base 的一个实例.不好.
And c would end up pointing to an instance of Base. Bad.
这篇关于派生类和基类之间指针到指针的转换?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
编译器如何处理编译时分支?What do compilers do with compile-time branching?(编译器如何处理编译时分支?)
我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗Can I use if (pointer) instead of if (pointer != NULL)?(我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗?)
在 C/C++ 中检查空指针Checking for NULL pointer in C/C++(在 C/C++ 中检查空指针)
比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1))&quMath-like chaining of the comparison operator - as in, quot;if ( (5lt;jlt;=1) )quot;(比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1)))
“if constexpr()"之间的区别与“if()"Difference between quot;if constexpr()quot; Vs quot;if()quot;(“if constexpr()之间的区别与“if())
C++,'if' 表达式中的变量声明C++, variable declaration in #39;if#39; expression(C++,if 表达式中的变量声明)