在 C++11 中,这是现在有效的语法:
In C++11, this is now valid syntax:
vector<vector<float>> MyMatrix;
而以前,它必须这样写(注意空格):
whereas previously, it had to be written like this (notice the space):
vector<vector<float> > MyMatrix;
我的问题是标准用于允许第一个版本的修复是什么?
My question is what is the fix that the standard uses to allow the first version?
是否可以像将 >> 变成标记而不是 >>> 一样简单?如果不是这样,那么这种方法有什么不适用的?
Could it be as simply as making > a token instead of >>? If that's not it, what does not work with this approach?
我认为像 myTemplate< 这样的形式x>>3 > 不是问题,因为您可以通过执行 myTemplate<(x>>3)> 来消除它们的歧义.
I consider that forms like myTemplate< x>>3 > are a non-problem, since you can disambiguate them by doing myTemplate<(x>>3)>.
通过在解析模板参数时在解析规则中添加特殊情况来修复.
It's fixed by adding a special case to the parsing rules when parsing template arguments.
C++11 14.2/3: 当解析一个template-argument-list时,第一个非嵌套的>被当作结束分隔符而不是一个大于运算符.类似地,第一个非嵌套的 >>> 被视为两个连续但不同的 > 标记,其中第一个被视为 的结尾template-argument-list 并完成template-id.
C++11 14.2/3: When parsing a template-argument-list, the first non-nested
>is taken as the ending delimiter rather than a greater-than operator. Similarly, the first non-nested>>is treated as two consecutive but distinct>tokens, the first of which is taken as the end of the template-argument-list and completes the template-id.
这篇关于C++ 模板角括号陷阱 - C++11 修复是什么?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
编译器如何处理编译时分支?What do compilers do with compile-time branching?(编译器如何处理编译时分支?)
我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗Can I use if (pointer) instead of if (pointer != NULL)?(我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗?)
在 C/C++ 中检查空指针Checking for NULL pointer in C/C++(在 C/C++ 中检查空指针)
比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1))&quMath-like chaining of the comparison operator - as in, quot;if ( (5lt;jlt;=1) )quot;(比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1)))
“if constexpr()"之间的区别与“if()"Difference between quot;if constexpr()quot; Vs quot;if()quot;(“if constexpr()之间的区别与“if())
C++,'if' 表达式中的变量声明C++, variable declaration in #39;if#39; expression(C++,if 表达式中的变量声明)