我很震惊,这是允许的:
I was just shocked, that this is allowed:
if( int* x = new int( 20 ) )
{
std::cout << *x << "!
";
// delete x;
}
else
{
std::cout << *x << "!!!
";
// delete x;
}
// std:cout << *x; // error - x is not defined in this scope
那么,这是标准允许的还是只是编译器扩展?
So, is this allowed by the standard or it's just a compiler extension?
P.S.因为有几个关于这个的评论 - 请忽略这个例子是坏的"或危险的.我知道什么.举个例子,这只是我想到的第一件事.
P.S. As there were several comments about this - please ignore that this example is "bad" or dangerous. I know what. This is just the first thing, that came to my mind, as an example.
这是规范允许的,因为 C++98.
This is allowed by the specification, since C++98.
来自第 6.4 节选择声明":
From Section 6.4 "Selection statements":
由条件中的声明引入的名称(由类型说明符序列或条件的声明符引入)的范围从其声明点到由条件控制的子语句结束.
A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the condition) is in scope from its point of declaration until the end of the substatements controlled by the condition.
以下示例来自同一部分:
The following example is from the same section:
if (int x = f()) {
int x; // ill-formed, redeclaration of x
}
else {
int x; // ill-formed, redeclaration of x
}
这篇关于在 if 语句的条件部分定义变量?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
编译器如何处理编译时分支?What do compilers do with compile-time branching?(编译器如何处理编译时分支?)
我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗Can I use if (pointer) instead of if (pointer != NULL)?(我可以使用 if (pointer) 而不是 if (pointer != NULL) 吗?)
在 C/C++ 中检查空指针Checking for NULL pointer in C/C++(在 C/C++ 中检查空指针)
比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1))&quMath-like chaining of the comparison operator - as in, quot;if ( (5lt;jlt;=1) )quot;(比较运算符的数学式链接-如“if((5<j<=1)))
“if constexpr()"之间的区别与“if()"Difference between quot;if constexpr()quot; Vs quot;if()quot;(“if constexpr()之间的区别与“if())
C++,'if' 表达式中的变量声明C++, variable declaration in #39;if#39; expression(C++,if 表达式中的变量声明)