I'm profiling the following code's memory usage using the Timeline in Chrome Dev Tools v27.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv='content-type' content='text/html; charset=UTF-8' />
<title>RAF</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type='text/javascript' charset='utf-8'>
var frame = function() {
window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame(frame);
};
window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame(frame);
</script>
</body>
</html>
Notice it's simple. But eventually I see the a tooth pattern appear that indicates the garbage collector is reclaiming memory.
Does raf create garbage objects by default? Is there any way to avoid this? Thx.
I have found out the following: If you change your RAF function into two "ping-pong" like functions, you get alot less garbage. You can't avoid the first initial "big GC", but after that you see only minor GCs of about 50kb instead of 700kb-1mb GCs. The code will look like this:
<script type='text/javascript' charset='utf-8'>
window.frameA = function() {
window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame(window.frameB);
};
window.frameB = function() {
window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame(window.frameA);
};
window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame(window.frameA);
</script>
I guess this is the best you can do in Chrome. I noticed that in FF the gc intervals or memory hardly changes, so its probably related to the chrome debugging stuff (see the linked chrome bug report above for more details). However, I noticed an improvement in my own game when deploying RAF like this - and heck I need to be able to debug it without artificial GCs that won't happen on normal users machines.
这篇关于requestAnimationFrame 垃圾回收的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
即使在调用 abort (jQuery) 之后,浏览器也会等待Browser waits for ajax call to complete even after abort has been called (jQuery)(即使在调用 abort (jQuery) 之后,浏览器也会等待 ajax 调用
JavaScript innerHTML 不适用于 IE?JavaScript innerHTML is not working for IE?(JavaScript innerHTML 不适用于 IE?)
XMLHttpRequest 无法加载,请求的资源上不存在“AXMLHttpRequest cannot load, No #39;Access-Control-Allow-Origin#39; header is present on the requested resource(XMLHttpRequest 无法加载,请求的资
XHR HEAD 请求是否有可能不遵循重定向 (301 302)Is it possible for XHR HEAD requests to not follow redirects (301 302)(XHR HEAD 请求是否有可能不遵循重定向 (301 302))
XMLHttpRequest 206 部分内容XMLHttpRequest 206 Partial Content(XMLHttpRequest 206 部分内容)
XMLHttpRequest 的 getResponseHeader() 的限制?Restrictions of XMLHttpRequest#39;s getResponseHeader()?(XMLHttpRequest 的 getResponseHeader() 的限制?)