所以,这不是一般的条件排序"问题……我在这里遇到了一个相当棘手的问题.:-) 我想让我的存储过程为结果提供条件排序.通常,这可以通过以下方式完成:
So, this is not your average 'conditional sort by' question... I have a rather tricky problem here. :-) I want to allow my stored procedure to offer a conditional sort order for the results. Normally this can be done in the following manner:
SELECT *
INTO #ResultsBeforeSubset
FROM
MyTable
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN @SortAscending=1 THEN 'SortColumn' END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortAscending=0 THEN 'SortColumn' END DESC
我想围绕实际的 ASC
/DESC
做一个 CASE
语句,但这不起作用.上述方法起作用的原因是,当@SortAscending
不等于给定值时,SQL 服务器将CASE
语句转换为常量NULL代码>.所以,如果
@SortAscending
是 0,你实际上有:
I'd like to do a CASE
statement around the actual ASC
/DESC
, but that doesn't work. The reason the above method works is because, when @SortAscending
isn't equal to the given value, SQL server translates the CASE
statement into the constant NULL
. So, if @SortAscending
is 0, you effectively have:
ORDER BY
NULL ASC,
SortColumn DESC
然后,第一个排序表达式什么也不做.这是有效的,因为在常规 SELECT
语句中,您可以在 ORDER BY
子句中使用常量.
The first sort expression, then, just does nothing. This works because in a regular SELECT
statement you can use constant in an ORDER BY
clause.
问题是,我在存储过程中排序的时间是在包含窗口函数 ROW_NUMBER()
的 SELECT
语句期间.因此,我想将 CASE
语句放在其 OVER
子句中,如下所示:
Trouble is, the time that I'm sorting in my stored proc is during a SELECT
statement which contains a windowed function ROW_NUMBER()
. I therefore want to put the CASE
statement inside its OVER
clause, like so:
SELECT *
INTO #ResultsBeforeSubset
FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN @SortAscending=1 THEN rowValues.[SortColumn] END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortAscending=0 THEN rowValues.[SortColumn] END DESC
) AS RowNumber,
*
FROM (
-- UNIONed SELECTs returning rows go here...
) rowValues
) rowValuesWithRowNum
不幸的是,当您运行存储过程时,这会导致以下错误:
Unfortunately, this causes the following error when you run the stored procedure:
Windowed functions do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
因为这是一个窗口函数的子句,所以CASE
语句到常量NULL
的转换是无效的.
Because this is the clause of a windowed function, the conversion of the CASE
statement to the constant NULL
is invalid.
谁能想出一种方法,我可以有条件地改变 UNION
ed SELECT
的排序顺序,并为这些排序结果产生的每一行分配行号?我知道我可以将整个查询构造为一个字符串并作为完全动态的 SQL 执行它,但如果可能的话,我宁愿避免这种情况.
Can anyone think of a way that I can conditionally vary the sort order of UNION
ed SELECT
s, and assign row numbers to each row resulting from these sorted results? I know I could resort to constructing the entire query as a string and execute that as fully dynamic SQL, but I'd rather avoid that if possible.
更新: 看起来问题不是由 CASE
语句本身引起的,而是因为我只使用了CASE
语句的条件子句中的常量值.我对这种奇怪的行为提出了一个新问题 这里.
UPDATE: Looks like the problem wasn't caused by the CASE
statement per se, but by the fact that I was using only constant values in the CASE
statement's conditional clause. I've started up a new question on this curious behaviour here.
您可以在两个方向分配行号,并在外部 order by
中选择一个:
You could assign row numbers in two directions, and pick one in an outer order by
:
select *
from (
select row_number() over (order by SortColumn) rn1
, row_number() over (order by SortColumn) rn2
, *
from @t
) as SubQueryAlias
order by
case when @asc=1 then rn1 end
, case when @asc=0 then rn2 end desc
SE 数据的工作示例.
这篇关于SQL Server 窗口函数子句中的条件排序顺序的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!