标题几乎说明了一切.基本上,这样做是否合法:
The title pretty much says it all. Basically, is it legal to do this:
class Base {
//stuff
}
class Derived: public Base {
//more stuff
}
vector<Base> foo;
Derived bar;
foo.push_back(bar);
根据我看过的其他帖子,以下内容是可以的,但我不想在这种情况下使用指针,因为它更难使其线程安全.
Based on other posts I've seen, the following is okay, but I don't want to use pointers in this case because it's harder to make it thread safe.
vector<Base*> foo;
Derived* bar = new Derived;
foo.push_back(bar);
不,Derived 对象将是 sliced:所有额外的成员都将被丢弃.
No, the Derived objects will be sliced: all additional members will be discarded.
使用 std::vector.
这篇关于c ++:可以矢量<Base>包含派生类型的对象?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
fpermissive 标志有什么作用?What does the fpermissive flag do?(fpermissive 标志有什么作用?)
如何在我不想编辑的第 3 方代码中禁用来自 gccHow do you disable the unused variable warnings coming out of gcc in 3rd party code I do not wish to edit?(如何在我不想编辑的第 3 方代码中禁
使用 GCC 预编译头文件Precompiled headers with GCC(使用 GCC 预编译头文件)
如何在 OS X 中包含 omp.h?How to include omp.h in OS X?(如何在 OS X 中包含 omp.h?)
如何让 GCC 将 .text 部分编译为可写在 ELF 二进制文How can I make GCC compile the .text section as writable in an ELF binary?(如何让 GCC 将 .text 部分编译为可写在 ELF 二进制文件中?)
GCC、字符串化和内联 GLSL?GCC, stringification, and inline GLSL?(GCC、字符串化和内联 GLSL?)