我似乎无法使用基类作为函数参数,我是否弄乱了我的继承?
I seem to be unable to use a base class as a function parameter, have I messed up my inheritance?
我的主要内容如下:
int some_ftn(Foo *f) { /* some code */ };
Bar b;
some_ftn(&b);
还有以这种方式从 Foo 继承的 Bar 类:
And the class Bar inheriting from Foo in such a way:
class Bar : Foo
{
public:
Bar();
//snip
private:
//snip
};
这样不行吗?我似乎无法在主函数中进行该调用
Should this not work? I don't seem to be able to make that call in my main function
你必须这样做:
class Bar : public Foo
{
// ...
}
C++中class的默认继承类型是private,所以任何public和protected成员都来自基类仅限于 private.struct 另一方面,默认继承是 public.
The default inheritance type of a class in C++ is private, so any public and protected members from the base class are limited to private. struct inheritance on the other hand is public by default.
这篇关于C++ 继承 - 无法访问的基础?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速In what ways do C++ exceptions slow down code when there are no exceptions thown?(当没有异常时,C++ 异常会以何种方式减慢代码速度?)
为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?Why catch an exception as reference-to-const?(为什么要捕获异常作为对 const 的引用?)
我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?When and how should I use exception handling?(我应该何时以及如何使用异常处理?)
C++中异常对象的范围Scope of exception object in C++(C++中异常对象的范围)
从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常Catching exceptions from a constructor#39;s initializer list(从构造函数的初始化列表中捕获异常)
C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别Difference between C++03 throw() specifier C++11 noexcept(C++03 throw() 说明符 C++11 noexcept 之间的区别)