我只是想知道如果你做这样的事情是否会降低速度或效率:
I am just wondering if there would be any loss of speed or efficiency if you did something like this:
int i = 0;
while(i < 100)
{
int var = 4;
i++;
}
声明 int var 一百次.在我看来好像会有,但我不确定.这样做会更实用/更快吗:
which declares int var one hundred times. It seems to me like there would be, but I'm not sure. would it be more practical/faster to do this instead:
int i = 0;
int var;
while(i < 100)
{
var = 4;
i++;
}
或者它们在速度和效率方面是否相同?
or are they the same, speedwise and efficiency-wise?
局部变量的栈空间通常在函数作用域内分配.所以循环内部不会发生堆栈指针调整,只是将 4 分配给 var.因此,这两个代码段具有相同的开销.
Stack space for local variables is usually allocated in function scope. So no stack pointer adjustment happens inside the loop, just assigning 4 to var. Therefore these two snippets have the same overhead.
这篇关于在循环中声明变量是否有任何开销?(C++)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板网!
如何在 C++ 中读取和操作 CSV 文件数据?How can I read and manipulate CSV file data in C++?(如何在 C++ 中读取和操作 CSV 文件数据?)
在 C++ 中,为什么我不能像这样编写 for() 循环:In C++ why can#39;t I write a for() loop like this: for( int i = 1, double i2 = 0; (在 C++ 中,为什么我不能像这样编写 for() 循环: for(
OpenMP 如何处理嵌套循环?How does OpenMP handle nested loops?(OpenMP 如何处理嵌套循环?)
在循环 C++ 中重用线程Reusing thread in loop c++(在循环 C++ 中重用线程)
需要精确的线程睡眠.最大 1ms 误差Precise thread sleep needed. Max 1ms error(需要精确的线程睡眠.最大 1ms 误差)
是否需要“do {...} while ()"?环形?Is there ever a need for a quot;do {...} while ( )quot; loop?(是否需要“do {...} while ()?环形?)